Dear David Icke,
It has long since been said that you contaminate the truth about the evil and corruption in the world with idiotic nonsense thus discrediting everything. If somebody was to shit diarrhoea in the cake display, nobody would touch even the delicacies in boxes at the farthest edge. And that, mate, is what you do; like it or not. You could have or could still choose not to but you persist in doing it with the kind of arrogance which only makes you and your followers look even more pathetic.
And over the years you have made many patently false claims, some of which you swept away after they were exposed, some you never let go. You like to tell everybody that you said this, that or the other twenty five years ago when, in fact, you were repeating allegations made by somebody else and trying to take the credit. Or you may claim to have brought something to the world's attention when in fact it is a blatent lie such as your claim to have exposed Jimmy Savile when there is not a shred of evidence that you mentioned him in relation to any of his depravity until after his death - not unlike the mainstream media you claim to oppose.
But here's a joke from yesterday's David Icke headlines page which I was going to ignore but which is like an itch no amount of scratching will rid:
So Who Knew What? – Banned BBC Not The Nine O’Clock News Sketch (1979-1982)
What the fuck are you talking about, Icke? Banned? Where did you find that this video was banned? I realise that journalists of your calibre like to keep their sources confidential but perhaps you can simply point the reader to any evidence whatsoever that it is banned at all.
You often go on about repeaters but you are as much a repeater as anybody. You posted this story without so much as even asking yourself if its claim was true.
You are full of shit.
Showing posts with label Censorship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Censorship. Show all posts
Wednesday, 9 July 2014
Monday, 27 January 2014
Censorship: Suppressive Powers for the Masses
I think everybody who isn't fascinated by the arrest of Justin Bieber will be aware that the mainstream media manipulates the news and, more subtly, its coverage of the news to suit its agenda or that which it has been assigned. It's so obvious and well documented, it is almost a waste of a paragraph to even mention it but it has to be reiterated in order to make a point which is in danger of becoming as much of a truism because whilst it is unacceptable that the mainstream news media effectively lie (omission is a form of censorship and deception ergo a lie), it is accepted that they do. It is, by virtue of their stated remit, even less acceptable for the so-called alternative media to censor especially when they openly market themselves as an antedote to the homogenous diet of information which people are fed daily. It's common knowledge that Alex Jones will not tolerate any criticism of Israel. Indymedia, who are ostensibly diametrically opposed to Infowars also avoid, as much as possible, the Israel thing (except when it involves Palestinians) and comb out any posts which mention 9/11 (except when it endorses Keane and Hamilton), Freemasons, chemtrails or a multitude of other subjects which, for its own purposes, it deems inappropriate.
But what about our latest alternative outlet? A voice for the voiceless. Be part of the heard not the herd.
Well, that's all well and good but what if the voice does not agree with you? What if the mind behind the voice actually thinks you are not quite as virtuous as you make out? There is always censorship but that would not look too good, would it. It goes on within the alternative media and it subsidiaries and everybody knows about it but it is forbidden to mention it - that will result in further censorship. In not so extreme cases, this could lead to banning or, as mentioned previously, what one forum euphemistically calls, 'inactive' which suggests that the user has elected not to say anything for a while. Not unlike a police officer looking down upon a bloody beaten prisoner tied to a chair with gaffer tape over his mouth and saying, 'he's gone a bit quite'. It's the same fucking game, Sean. You are no different.
But what is (only slightly) more surprising is how easily the rest of the flock come around to that way of thinking - just like the liberal Obama supporters who overnight saw the merit and positive ethical aspects of drone strikes on foreign civilians.
Today, we have one David Icke forum member, 3point5 saying, 'I help run a pretty popular Facebook page. We kept having one or two members that were causing grief on the Facebook page. You know what we did? We blocked them. It solved the problem instantly, and it meant we didn't drag our own name through the mud by arguing with them publicly.'
Whilst forum moderator, scottishryan responds, 'You are completely correct, I find blocking out such disturbances works the best. I personally had to do it in my Youtube Channel too, there is a line that can be crossed when this is the best first option to take.'
Yeah, fucking hypocrites, right? That's what they are all saying on the forum at sanctumzone.co.uk - all the refugees from David Icke's forum who are disenchanted, suspended or ...er inactive have gathered at one of the relatively new so-called alternative (to) David Icke forums. All those self-congratulatory folk, not unlike the Obama types, who think they have found a life raft in the turbulent sea of censorship. Except that they haven't because sanctumzone.co.uk is guilty of censorship like the two previously mentioned strata of deception; whether intentionally or by neglect. Having experienced the digital Heath-Robinson of the sanctumzone.co.uk forum, I am willing to accept the possibility that there is some technical explanation for what I have witnessed but until I have received an explanation from whoever is responsible for the site's administration, I am going to assume the inevitable. And I am willing to wager that all the other alternative Icke sites are equally flawed in their ethics.
What is certain is that there is no such thing as free speech anywhere on the internet where there are people with administrative privileges acting as gatekeepers. I tried it once - the only posts I deleted were blatant spam with links to whatever was being flogged at the time. Ironically, one or two of the members didn't like free speech and at least one of them has spent the past eight or nine years bad mouthing me for all manner of ridiculous ills conjured up by their paranoid delusions. S/he is a moron. I could name them but why throw fireworks on the fire? Self-censorship? Maybe but I believe in the words of Henry Delaune, 'Think all you speak but speak not all you think;' and I assure you, some people don't know how grateful they might be for that. Unfortunately, in this digital world everybody who is counter-inclined has the indiscriminate power of a flamethrower.
But what about our latest alternative outlet? A voice for the voiceless. Be part of the heard not the herd.
Well, that's all well and good but what if the voice does not agree with you? What if the mind behind the voice actually thinks you are not quite as virtuous as you make out? There is always censorship but that would not look too good, would it. It goes on within the alternative media and it subsidiaries and everybody knows about it but it is forbidden to mention it - that will result in further censorship. In not so extreme cases, this could lead to banning or, as mentioned previously, what one forum euphemistically calls, 'inactive' which suggests that the user has elected not to say anything for a while. Not unlike a police officer looking down upon a bloody beaten prisoner tied to a chair with gaffer tape over his mouth and saying, 'he's gone a bit quite'. It's the same fucking game, Sean. You are no different.
But what is (only slightly) more surprising is how easily the rest of the flock come around to that way of thinking - just like the liberal Obama supporters who overnight saw the merit and positive ethical aspects of drone strikes on foreign civilians.
Today, we have one David Icke forum member, 3point5 saying, 'I help run a pretty popular Facebook page. We kept having one or two members that were causing grief on the Facebook page. You know what we did? We blocked them. It solved the problem instantly, and it meant we didn't drag our own name through the mud by arguing with them publicly.'
Whilst forum moderator, scottishryan responds, 'You are completely correct, I find blocking out such disturbances works the best. I personally had to do it in my Youtube Channel too, there is a line that can be crossed when this is the best first option to take.'
Yeah, fucking hypocrites, right? That's what they are all saying on the forum at sanctumzone.co.uk - all the refugees from David Icke's forum who are disenchanted, suspended or ...er inactive have gathered at one of the relatively new so-called alternative (to) David Icke forums. All those self-congratulatory folk, not unlike the Obama types, who think they have found a life raft in the turbulent sea of censorship. Except that they haven't because sanctumzone.co.uk is guilty of censorship like the two previously mentioned strata of deception; whether intentionally or by neglect. Having experienced the digital Heath-Robinson of the sanctumzone.co.uk forum, I am willing to accept the possibility that there is some technical explanation for what I have witnessed but until I have received an explanation from whoever is responsible for the site's administration, I am going to assume the inevitable. And I am willing to wager that all the other alternative Icke sites are equally flawed in their ethics.
What is certain is that there is no such thing as free speech anywhere on the internet where there are people with administrative privileges acting as gatekeepers. I tried it once - the only posts I deleted were blatant spam with links to whatever was being flogged at the time. Ironically, one or two of the members didn't like free speech and at least one of them has spent the past eight or nine years bad mouthing me for all manner of ridiculous ills conjured up by their paranoid delusions. S/he is a moron. I could name them but why throw fireworks on the fire? Self-censorship? Maybe but I believe in the words of Henry Delaune, 'Think all you speak but speak not all you think;' and I assure you, some people don't know how grateful they might be for that. Unfortunately, in this digital world everybody who is counter-inclined has the indiscriminate power of a flamethrower.
Saturday, 25 January 2014
Hypocrite Considers Throwing Persistent Internet Pirates in Jail [sic]
OK, so, it's only two days since I publicly announced that I was bored with it all but I wasn't expecting David Icke to throw me an irrisistable meaty chunk like this.
Anybody with any interest in free speech and who has observed the Stalinist censorship on David Icke's forum will know that any mention of certain words or phrases relating to BitTorrent will be redacted with a nice row of asterisks and links to torrent sites will consquently have thir URLs broken. The reason for this is supposed to be because it is illegal to mention BitTorrent or link to torrent sites, according to clueless Technical Adviser, 'i_am'. As pointed out previously here, that would put many major websites such as The Guardian, BBC, Wikipedia, Google and thousands of others on the wrong side of the law. The real reason, as is pretty evident when one has frequented some of the torrent sites in question, is that David Icke, via his sidekick, Sean Adl Tabatabai, has threatened those sites with legal action unless torrent of his 'message' are removed.
Before we go on to today's little gem, perhaps we should explore this facet of David Icke's persona for a moment. He proselytises that people should see through materialism because it is all an illusion, he never ceases preaching about how tirelessly he works to get 'material' out and at a very famous turning point in his life, claimed to be a son of the godhead.
Without wishing to make a direct comparison, just suppose that Jesus returned. Would it be reasonable of him to threaten people with legal action for sharing the message which he was so interested in spreading? However, that is what David Icke, who is regarded by many on his forum as a saviour, does, and does so to protect the income he makes from the sales of hard copies of his material. And he is quite happy for people with very little money to forego paying their rent in order to line his pockets. This is a man who quotes Gandhi and borrowed the words of Jesus for the title of one of his books, '...and the truth shall set you free'. Unfortunately, his disciples cannot see the truth of utter hypocrisy at every level of this man. Many have given money they can ill-afford to do without in order to fuel the latest vehicle for his ego in the belief that he will save them. They are stretching their cognitive dissonance to its limit yet still yearn to find another last penny to donate. But that's just the back end. Anybody with any objective detached reasoning can see what a phony, David Icke is, his integrity has the breaking strain of a Kit-Kat.
Professing that everything, including money, is an illusion whilst charging people to read and hear what you have to say on the matter shows about as much faith in one's own words as the Pope riding around in a bullet-proof Popemobile [nod to Bill Hicks] or the Church of England insuring its buildings against acts of God.
Bullshit!
Anyway, on today's David Icke headlines page, I saw this:
UK Considers Throwing Persistent Internet Pirates in Jail [sic]
‘During a debate on the UK’s Intellectual Property Bill, the Prime Minister’s Intellectual Property Adviser has again called for a tougher approach to online file-sharing. In addition to recommending “withdrawing Internet rights from lawbreakers”, Mike Weatherley MP significantly raised the bar by stating that the government must now consider “some sort of custodial sentence for persistent offenders.” Google also got a bashing – again.’
Which in turn, links to this on Torrent Freak:
UK Considers Throwing Persistent Internet Pirates in Jail [sic]
It may not be immediately apparent but here we see yet another dimension to David Icke's hypocrisy. He appears to be giving a display of support for internet freedom whilst taking his own stand against filesharers. But, not only that, he has posted a link to a site which is forbidden on his website forum. I wonder how 'sean', 'i_am', 'ex sheep' and 'zhiba' will explain the asterisks should anybody attempt to share David Icke's headline story on the forum.
I doubt that any of David Icke's lieutenants ever visit here but if they do and read this far, you are lost so far up your master's arsehole, you cannot tell shit from Sugar Puffs.
Anybody with any interest in free speech and who has observed the Stalinist censorship on David Icke's forum will know that any mention of certain words or phrases relating to BitTorrent will be redacted with a nice row of asterisks and links to torrent sites will consquently have thir URLs broken. The reason for this is supposed to be because it is illegal to mention BitTorrent or link to torrent sites, according to clueless Technical Adviser, 'i_am'. As pointed out previously here, that would put many major websites such as The Guardian, BBC, Wikipedia, Google and thousands of others on the wrong side of the law. The real reason, as is pretty evident when one has frequented some of the torrent sites in question, is that David Icke, via his sidekick, Sean Adl Tabatabai, has threatened those sites with legal action unless torrent of his 'message' are removed.
Before we go on to today's little gem, perhaps we should explore this facet of David Icke's persona for a moment. He proselytises that people should see through materialism because it is all an illusion, he never ceases preaching about how tirelessly he works to get 'material' out and at a very famous turning point in his life, claimed to be a son of the godhead.
Without wishing to make a direct comparison, just suppose that Jesus returned. Would it be reasonable of him to threaten people with legal action for sharing the message which he was so interested in spreading? However, that is what David Icke, who is regarded by many on his forum as a saviour, does, and does so to protect the income he makes from the sales of hard copies of his material. And he is quite happy for people with very little money to forego paying their rent in order to line his pockets. This is a man who quotes Gandhi and borrowed the words of Jesus for the title of one of his books, '...and the truth shall set you free'. Unfortunately, his disciples cannot see the truth of utter hypocrisy at every level of this man. Many have given money they can ill-afford to do without in order to fuel the latest vehicle for his ego in the belief that he will save them. They are stretching their cognitive dissonance to its limit yet still yearn to find another last penny to donate. But that's just the back end. Anybody with any objective detached reasoning can see what a phony, David Icke is, his integrity has the breaking strain of a Kit-Kat.
Professing that everything, including money, is an illusion whilst charging people to read and hear what you have to say on the matter shows about as much faith in one's own words as the Pope riding around in a bullet-proof Popemobile [nod to Bill Hicks] or the Church of England insuring its buildings against acts of God.
Bullshit!
Anyway, on today's David Icke headlines page, I saw this:
UK Considers Throwing Persistent Internet Pirates in Jail [sic]
‘During a debate on the UK’s Intellectual Property Bill, the Prime Minister’s Intellectual Property Adviser has again called for a tougher approach to online file-sharing. In addition to recommending “withdrawing Internet rights from lawbreakers”, Mike Weatherley MP significantly raised the bar by stating that the government must now consider “some sort of custodial sentence for persistent offenders.” Google also got a bashing – again.’
Which in turn, links to this on Torrent Freak:
UK Considers Throwing Persistent Internet Pirates in Jail [sic]
It may not be immediately apparent but here we see yet another dimension to David Icke's hypocrisy. He appears to be giving a display of support for internet freedom whilst taking his own stand against filesharers. But, not only that, he has posted a link to a site which is forbidden on his website forum. I wonder how 'sean', 'i_am', 'ex sheep' and 'zhiba' will explain the asterisks should anybody attempt to share David Icke's headline story on the forum.
I doubt that any of David Icke's lieutenants ever visit here but if they do and read this far, you are lost so far up your master's arsehole, you cannot tell shit from Sugar Puffs.
Thursday, 23 January 2014
Bored with it all, now...
I was planning to write an article today entitled, 'If David Icke did not exists the New World Order would have to invent him'. But I'm not going to bother, I really can't be arsed.
I'm not so stupid that I would say that I will never post again and it may well be that I post again next week, next month or later today. But I really feel like saying, fuck it. Fuck everything and everybody - I'm going to trash my conscience and get a sales job selling shit to any fool who will buy it and live it up on the killing I will make. Not that I am capable of ignoring my conscience, I just sometimes wish I didn't give a shit and that living on this planet wasn't such agony.
I have reached the point that I think that only divine or alien intervention can save humanity from itself. I think I reached that conclusion many years ago but refused to give up fighting anyway. The last few years have been one coffee morning after another in terms of dawning reality. There has been just one long list of disappointments as far as what I have thought I could believe.
The recent farce and malfeasance which has been evident at a certain new media outfit coupled with the emergent ethical fascism 2.1 on the forum which gave its backing to the project; moral, material, creative and financial didn't come as any surprise to me. I have had personal dealings with some of the players involved and although, like many, I hoped something good would come out of it, I said privately that I predicted that the main personality behind it would either resign or be forced out within a year, mainly because I have seen things come together in the same badly conceived way before and I could not imagine that adding a great deal of money to the formula would help - in fact, it would be like throwing petrol on a fire, an instantaneous flash of energy which could not be sustained.
Hiring people who have qualification and/or experience but lacking in knowledge and commitment to the idea - rather than the organisation whilst exploiting the good will and depth of others is a recipe for conflict which would feed on itself. I've seen this in charity organisations as the transform from grass roots organic groups into corporations. The soul is bought out. Revelations which testify to this in this instance emerge almost daily.
The assurance of free speech for all is made in publicity material but there are countless instances of people who have volunteered their voices and skill but have been ignored. The forum from whence much of the viewership spends much of its time has become an information police state. You support the project or you are out, either temporarily suspended or permanently - as they newspeak euphemistically put it, inactive.
There are plenty of other forums which give voice to those people who do not share the narrow views of that forum and they have become busier over the past few months as members are suspended or made inactive. They feed on discord and are a feeding ground for gossip and logical triple jumps - woe betide anybody who can be cross referenced by the smallest detail - they will be marked for life. I tried to follow the lynching of one individual through several pages of one thread and there was not one single attempt to verify the information being posted before the horse's backside was slapped and the victim was left dancing on the end of a rope.
These forums are merely another level of a riven society. They are operated as macrofascist communities who tease out their own agendas to create another in a myriad of ideological apartheids. If they use the same methodology, they are no better than the regimes they purport to expose, they should be avoided by any free thinking person. They are an angry mob writ digital.
I concede that having written about certain matters, I have contributed to the online mire and I recognise that sometimes it is impossible not to vent one's spleen but it it is probably having imbibed toxic material which was the cause of the need to expell it and there is virtually an infinite amount of it being squirted into the human brain which it is incapable of processing. I don't really know how to stop it but the inevitable conclusion of over consumption of information; unverified, useless, news, gossip, statistics, crap, horror, titilation, illusion, fear, hate etc. etc. is some form of psychosis.
I was minded just how germaine this is when I read the following story:
Mother urges internet awareness after daughter's suicide
In the article, the girl's mother summed it up perfectly and concisely when she said that her daughter had been 'in the clutches of a toxic digital world'. That is exactly what I see. I can see how people with certain personalities or characteristics will become addicted to the toxins and will not be able to wrench themselves from it. Fortunately for me, I have a personality which binges on something until it makes me sick and then at some point recognise that it has to stop and act decisivley - or at least try to. Hence my abstention from alcohol, tobacco and other drugs as well as from television. Purging myself from the toxic digital world may prove more problematic as so much of modern life is wired into it but seeing it for what it is is a start.
I'm not so stupid that I would say that I will never post again and it may well be that I post again next week, next month or later today. But I really feel like saying, fuck it. Fuck everything and everybody - I'm going to trash my conscience and get a sales job selling shit to any fool who will buy it and live it up on the killing I will make. Not that I am capable of ignoring my conscience, I just sometimes wish I didn't give a shit and that living on this planet wasn't such agony.
I have reached the point that I think that only divine or alien intervention can save humanity from itself. I think I reached that conclusion many years ago but refused to give up fighting anyway. The last few years have been one coffee morning after another in terms of dawning reality. There has been just one long list of disappointments as far as what I have thought I could believe.
The recent farce and malfeasance which has been evident at a certain new media outfit coupled with the emergent ethical fascism 2.1 on the forum which gave its backing to the project; moral, material, creative and financial didn't come as any surprise to me. I have had personal dealings with some of the players involved and although, like many, I hoped something good would come out of it, I said privately that I predicted that the main personality behind it would either resign or be forced out within a year, mainly because I have seen things come together in the same badly conceived way before and I could not imagine that adding a great deal of money to the formula would help - in fact, it would be like throwing petrol on a fire, an instantaneous flash of energy which could not be sustained.
Hiring people who have qualification and/or experience but lacking in knowledge and commitment to the idea - rather than the organisation whilst exploiting the good will and depth of others is a recipe for conflict which would feed on itself. I've seen this in charity organisations as the transform from grass roots organic groups into corporations. The soul is bought out. Revelations which testify to this in this instance emerge almost daily.
The assurance of free speech for all is made in publicity material but there are countless instances of people who have volunteered their voices and skill but have been ignored. The forum from whence much of the viewership spends much of its time has become an information police state. You support the project or you are out, either temporarily suspended or permanently - as they newspeak euphemistically put it, inactive.
There are plenty of other forums which give voice to those people who do not share the narrow views of that forum and they have become busier over the past few months as members are suspended or made inactive. They feed on discord and are a feeding ground for gossip and logical triple jumps - woe betide anybody who can be cross referenced by the smallest detail - they will be marked for life. I tried to follow the lynching of one individual through several pages of one thread and there was not one single attempt to verify the information being posted before the horse's backside was slapped and the victim was left dancing on the end of a rope.
These forums are merely another level of a riven society. They are operated as macrofascist communities who tease out their own agendas to create another in a myriad of ideological apartheids. If they use the same methodology, they are no better than the regimes they purport to expose, they should be avoided by any free thinking person. They are an angry mob writ digital.
I concede that having written about certain matters, I have contributed to the online mire and I recognise that sometimes it is impossible not to vent one's spleen but it it is probably having imbibed toxic material which was the cause of the need to expell it and there is virtually an infinite amount of it being squirted into the human brain which it is incapable of processing. I don't really know how to stop it but the inevitable conclusion of over consumption of information; unverified, useless, news, gossip, statistics, crap, horror, titilation, illusion, fear, hate etc. etc. is some form of psychosis.
I was minded just how germaine this is when I read the following story:
Mother urges internet awareness after daughter's suicide
In the article, the girl's mother summed it up perfectly and concisely when she said that her daughter had been 'in the clutches of a toxic digital world'. That is exactly what I see. I can see how people with certain personalities or characteristics will become addicted to the toxins and will not be able to wrench themselves from it. Fortunately for me, I have a personality which binges on something until it makes me sick and then at some point recognise that it has to stop and act decisivley - or at least try to. Hence my abstention from alcohol, tobacco and other drugs as well as from television. Purging myself from the toxic digital world may prove more problematic as so much of modern life is wired into it but seeing it for what it is is a start.
Monday, 20 January 2014
No Poetry Please! We're Loyal Servants of Adolf Ickeman
The Third RIcke on the David Icke Forum just took an anti-culture swipe at a forum member called giblet for speaking or, more precisely, typing in rhyme. The thread which contained the post has been exterminated and the author has been marched off to a death camp, the user's profile now says 'inactive' which is a David Icke Forum euphemism for banned; if the user tries to log in they will find that they cannot even read any posts let alone speak ill of Der Führer.
As can be seen from this URL, the post no longer exists:
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=266742
And if you are prepared to risk entering the Neo PolIcke State, here is giblet's remains:
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/member.php?u=80284
So, what did the wretched traitor write to deserve to be expunged? Fortunately, having had a premonition that they would pay the ultimate price, I copied it to my clipboard. I'm not a huge fan of poetry but occasionally I will hear or read something which resonates and before I even digested this, I felt there was something significant about it. And thankfully, giblet provided a short explanation to one of the less intellectually endowed forum members, as you will read.
I thank you, giblet, and I hope you do not object to be reproducing your work here, there is a link below to another page where you have published it. Here it is as it appeared on the David Icke Forum:
giblet
Advice Kid Your cards they are a tumbling and falling,
Pennies from heaven can not save you now,
For you destiny has come a calling,
Yet your demise seems a pity somehow.
But your days they have always been numbered,
Alongside all the steps that you would take,
To save each opportunity blundered,
Not just for your's but everyone's sake.
Your sheep are naked lost up on the moor,
Your dogs have been barking up the wrong tree,
One thing will remain forever for sure,
The simple fact that you never fooled me,
Though I smile as you take your final bow,
Your demise still seems a pity somehow.
rainbow pharoah
So what's your point
giblet
The title is an anagram of David Icke.
Pennies from heaven refers to his constant begging for money from his followers who perceive him to be some kind of saviour.
Opportunites blundered refers to the fact that although he has made a hash of The People's Voice he could fix it through accepting responsibility and moving on instead of blaming those who haven't sent him money.
Sheep is his favourite way of describing people who fail to follow his preachings. They are naked because they have been fleeced.
Dogs refers to the moderators on his forum who are rabid in their blind defence of him.
And yes his demise is a shame considering the good he could have done.
Advice Kid by Anthony Di'anno:
www.poemhunter.com/poem/advice-kid
As can be seen from this URL, the post no longer exists:
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=266742
And if you are prepared to risk entering the Neo PolIcke State, here is giblet's remains:
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/member.php?u=80284
So, what did the wretched traitor write to deserve to be expunged? Fortunately, having had a premonition that they would pay the ultimate price, I copied it to my clipboard. I'm not a huge fan of poetry but occasionally I will hear or read something which resonates and before I even digested this, I felt there was something significant about it. And thankfully, giblet provided a short explanation to one of the less intellectually endowed forum members, as you will read.
I thank you, giblet, and I hope you do not object to be reproducing your work here, there is a link below to another page where you have published it. Here it is as it appeared on the David Icke Forum:
giblet
Advice Kid Your cards they are a tumbling and falling,
Pennies from heaven can not save you now,
For you destiny has come a calling,
Yet your demise seems a pity somehow.
But your days they have always been numbered,
Alongside all the steps that you would take,
To save each opportunity blundered,
Not just for your's but everyone's sake.
Your sheep are naked lost up on the moor,
Your dogs have been barking up the wrong tree,
One thing will remain forever for sure,
The simple fact that you never fooled me,
Though I smile as you take your final bow,
Your demise still seems a pity somehow.
rainbow pharoah
So what's your point
giblet
The title is an anagram of David Icke.
Pennies from heaven refers to his constant begging for money from his followers who perceive him to be some kind of saviour.
Opportunites blundered refers to the fact that although he has made a hash of The People's Voice he could fix it through accepting responsibility and moving on instead of blaming those who haven't sent him money.
Sheep is his favourite way of describing people who fail to follow his preachings. They are naked because they have been fleeced.
Dogs refers to the moderators on his forum who are rabid in their blind defence of him.
And yes his demise is a shame considering the good he could have done.
Advice Kid by Anthony Di'anno:
www.poemhunter.com/poem/advice-kid
Wednesday, 13 November 2013
Icke Censorship Gathers Pace - Careful What You Say!
A few weeks ago, thee were reports that travelers who made jokes about securitywould be arrested.
TSA Announcement Tells Travelers They'll Be Arrested If They Make Jokes About Security
Now censorchip on David Icke's forum has reached the point that it is now unlawful to quote 'conspiratainment', however that may be defined.
A post by David Icke forum member grannie27 was censored by moderator shanticat:
And both are also helping to expose what is happening ,I guess its WHAT you do with the information they give out ...
Sit back in comfort behind your computer screen, knowing you know what they know (the whole ethos behind controlled opposition)
or
Take action on the information ......and make a REAL CHANGE
Last edited by shanticat; 13-11-2013 at 07:50 PM. Reason: conspirtainment quote
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=248381&page=3
Prior to the censorship, the thread had been discussing Russell Brand and Alex Jones and in particular, Jones' alleged pro-Israeli position. A post linking to a couple of anti-Jones videos was removed shortly beforehand:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6bckDsoZW4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0af1NPSTro
So much for free speech from the patron of The People's Voice!
TSA Announcement Tells Travelers They'll Be Arrested If They Make Jokes About Security
Now censorchip on David Icke's forum has reached the point that it is now unlawful to quote 'conspiratainment', however that may be defined.
A post by David Icke forum member grannie27 was censored by moderator shanticat:
And both are also helping to expose what is happening ,I guess its WHAT you do with the information they give out ...
Sit back in comfort behind your computer screen, knowing you know what they know (the whole ethos behind controlled opposition)
or
Take action on the information ......and make a REAL CHANGE
Last edited by shanticat; 13-11-2013 at 07:50 PM. Reason: conspirtainment quote
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=248381&page=3
Prior to the censorship, the thread had been discussing Russell Brand and Alex Jones and in particular, Jones' alleged pro-Israeli position. A post linking to a couple of anti-Jones videos was removed shortly beforehand:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6bckDsoZW4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0af1NPSTro
So much for free speech from the patron of The People's Voice!
Tuesday, 29 October 2013
David Icke's Continuing Censorship Hypocrisy Augurs Badly for The People's Voice
Since the last post about the idiotic censorship on David Icke's website forum, another thread was started to discuss (one can only assume) some of the latest developments in the issue of BitTorrent and the ongoing legal battles surrounding the peer-to-peer file sharing protocol:
******* Resurrected Less Than Two Weeks After $110
But readers can only guess what the post is about because any mention of the subject matter has been censored and the post looks like a redacted CIA extraordinary rendition document. The only way to guess which BitTorrent sites are mentioned is by counting the asterisks and trying to match names to the number of censored letters.
UPDATE
As anybody following the above link will observe, the thread has undergone total censorship as it has been completely removed. However, the post can be seen in the below image.
With just over two weeks to the launch of the supposed uncensored television channel, The People's Voice, David Icke is looking like a bit of a pillock censoring words which appear all over the internet. Just how fearless is this new broadcasting venture going to be when the channel's front man is too scared to mention a word which appears in the Oxford English Dictionary and on the BBC website:
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/BitTorrent
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19474829
David Icke, you really ought to pull yourself together and stop behaving like a dickhead; how can anybody take your claim of uncensored broadcasting seriously when your site's forum is full of racism, profanity and libel yet the word ********** is banned.
Grow the fuck up!
******* Resurrected Less Than Two Weeks After $110
But readers can only guess what the post is about because any mention of the subject matter has been censored and the post looks like a redacted CIA extraordinary rendition document. The only way to guess which BitTorrent sites are mentioned is by counting the asterisks and trying to match names to the number of censored letters.
UPDATE
As anybody following the above link will observe, the thread has undergone total censorship as it has been completely removed. However, the post can be seen in the below image.
With just over two weeks to the launch of the supposed uncensored television channel, The People's Voice, David Icke is looking like a bit of a pillock censoring words which appear all over the internet. Just how fearless is this new broadcasting venture going to be when the channel's front man is too scared to mention a word which appears in the Oxford English Dictionary and on the BBC website:
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/BitTorrent
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19474829
David Icke, you really ought to pull yourself together and stop behaving like a dickhead; how can anybody take your claim of uncensored broadcasting seriously when your site's forum is full of racism, profanity and libel yet the word ********** is banned.
Grow the fuck up!
Saturday, 19 October 2013
Don't Mention BitTorrent! At least not to David Icke
Just a month before the launch of David Icke's supposedly uncensored television channel, The People's Voice, a most ridiculous example of censorship has taken place on Icke's own website forum in keeping with earlier accounts.
The thread titled, ********** Bashes NSA In Billboard Campaign (now moved and locked) might lead readers to believe that some filthy mouthed poster had started this thread yet it transpires that the asterisks are there to obfuscate the word BitTorrent rather than a string of conventional expletives.
The forum's Technical Advisor claims that the reason is that Torrents contain copyrighted material but as pointed out by another forum user (and as anybody who has so much as glanced at The Pirate Bay saga) knows, this is absolute *******s, er... sorry, bollocks!
And even if there was some internet mandate which said that you cannot link to websites which contain torrent files (which there is not), the internet's own Big Brother, Google would be the greatest offender. But there is no law on this planet that says that you cannot write the word BitTorrent, if there was, all these 26,900,000 sites would be in breach of it:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=bittorrent
Note, that includes The Guardian, LA Times, Russia Today and Wikipedia. Google even hosts the official BitTorrent client for their Android operating system.
Perhaps the Technical Advisor on David Icke's website forum is talking out of his **** er... I mean arse! Maybe they are blatantly lying.
It is far more likely that the reason the subject of BitTorrent is such a prickly one for David Icke is that he has been known to have made threatening moves towards torrent sites which share his material and thus eat into his profits.
David Icke's self-righteous stance against censorship is a fucking joke! Sorry, a f*cking joke! He should be fucking embarr***ed. How often has the following image of a badge with the words, 'The Worst Part of Censorship is ****** ******' appeared on David Icke's headlines page?
It's impossible to estimate as it seems to appear every other day but here are some examples:
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/42677-in-the-middle-of-europe-a-democracy-introduces-press-censorship/
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/49042-in-further-case-of-censorship-the-bbc-deny-palestines-right-to-exist/
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/81726-press-hits-back-over-chilling-media-crackdown-as-campaigners-warn-internet-sites-face-threat-to-free-speech/
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/71289-bbc-caught-imposing-mass-comment-censorship-on-article-about-burma-abolishing-media-censorship/
As a slight aside, does David Icke ever stop asking for money? After having met the goal for his crowd funded television station in next to no time, the final amount raised was almost triple the original target, but even that didn't stop him as he's still begging for more and at a time when most people who are worst affected by those Icke points the finger at are struggling to choose between eating and heating. You might think that somebody who preaches that everything is an illusion (his latest money spinner which seems to head every page on his site is called The Perception Deception) might have the ability to transcend the need for ca$h.
The thread titled, ********** Bashes NSA In Billboard Campaign (now moved and locked) might lead readers to believe that some filthy mouthed poster had started this thread yet it transpires that the asterisks are there to obfuscate the word BitTorrent rather than a string of conventional expletives.
The forum's Technical Advisor claims that the reason is that Torrents contain copyrighted material but as pointed out by another forum user (and as anybody who has so much as glanced at The Pirate Bay saga) knows, this is absolute *******s, er... sorry, bollocks!
And even if there was some internet mandate which said that you cannot link to websites which contain torrent files (which there is not), the internet's own Big Brother, Google would be the greatest offender. But there is no law on this planet that says that you cannot write the word BitTorrent, if there was, all these 26,900,000 sites would be in breach of it:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=bittorrent
Note, that includes The Guardian, LA Times, Russia Today and Wikipedia. Google even hosts the official BitTorrent client for their Android operating system.
Perhaps the Technical Advisor on David Icke's website forum is talking out of his **** er... I mean arse! Maybe they are blatantly lying.
It is far more likely that the reason the subject of BitTorrent is such a prickly one for David Icke is that he has been known to have made threatening moves towards torrent sites which share his material and thus eat into his profits.
David Icke's self-righteous stance against censorship is a fucking joke! Sorry, a f*cking joke! He should be fucking embarr***ed. How often has the following image of a badge with the words, 'The Worst Part of Censorship is ****** ******' appeared on David Icke's headlines page?
It's impossible to estimate as it seems to appear every other day but here are some examples:
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/42677-in-the-middle-of-europe-a-democracy-introduces-press-censorship/
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/49042-in-further-case-of-censorship-the-bbc-deny-palestines-right-to-exist/
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/81726-press-hits-back-over-chilling-media-crackdown-as-campaigners-warn-internet-sites-face-threat-to-free-speech/
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/71289-bbc-caught-imposing-mass-comment-censorship-on-article-about-burma-abolishing-media-censorship/
As a slight aside, does David Icke ever stop asking for money? After having met the goal for his crowd funded television station in next to no time, the final amount raised was almost triple the original target, but even that didn't stop him as he's still begging for more and at a time when most people who are worst affected by those Icke points the finger at are struggling to choose between eating and heating. You might think that somebody who preaches that everything is an illusion (his latest money spinner which seems to head every page on his site is called The Perception Deception) might have the ability to transcend the need for ca$h.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)