Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack - Is The Answer In Britam Hacked e-mail?

It confounds comprehension to imagine that a government who knows that foreign powers are itching for an excuse to launch an attack would use chemical weapons against its own people whilst UN weapons inspectors are actually in the country. This is what we are being told by the mainstream media and what is being peddled by the war hungry in NATO.

Yet in January 2013 the UK defence contractor Britam had its e-mail hacked - which it eventually acknowledged - and a screen grab of one particular e-mail raised alarmed eyebrows across the internet and was briefly published by The Daily Mail's Mail Online website before disappearing very shortly afterwards. The Mail Online published a retraction which stated that they accepted that the e-mail was fabricated and that there was 'no truth in any suggestion that Britam or its directors were willing to consider taking part in such a plot, which may have led to an atrocity.'

The statement's choice of words is quite revealing. The Mail Online acceptance that the e-mail was fabricated is not a statement that it was indeed fabricated. Maybe Britam simply persuaded them that it was. But also stating that there was 'no truth in any suggestion that Britam or its directors were willing to consider taking part in such a plot, which may have led to an atrocity' does not mean that they had not been approached to do so or in fact that another company may well have been approached and accepted the proposed 'enormous sum'; the e-mail (click on the image below to see it full size) says:

Phil

We've got a new offer. It's about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.
We'll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have. They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.

Frankly, I don't think it's a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion?

Kind regards
David

 If this e-mail was in fact genuine, whether or not Britam accepted the pproposed offer, it speaks volumes.